The Many Layers of Reality or “Is a Fire Truck Really a Fire Truck?”

Jeff CarreiraBlog Posts, Philosophical Inquiry6 Comments

Is a fire truck really a fire truck? Is a truck really a truck? Is anything really what it is? We assume that things really are what they appear to us to be. This assumption is yet another form of the Myth of the Given. Unfortunately it isn’t true. Most of us have already realized that things are not always as they appear to us. I wanted to take this inquiry a little further.

Imagine this scene. You are walking with a friend near a busy street. You hear a siren sounding and then you point to one of many vehicles in the street and say, “Look, a fire truck.” Your friend immediately looks in the direction you are pointing toward and without even a thought recognizes the fire truck from among the many other vehicles in the crowded street.

But what is a fire truck…really? If we dismantle a fire truck into all of its parts and pieces and then pile those up on the ground and ask our friend what he sees when she looks at the pile she will probably not say “A fire truck.” She will say a pile of parts, or maybe just a pile of junk. All of the physical parts of the fire truck are still there, but the fire truck seems to be gone.

When we dismantled the fire truck we didn’t change the physical aspect of its reality we simply changed the functional aspect of its reality. Physically it is all still there, but the parts arranged randomly in a pile can no longer function like a fire truck. So we seem to have separated out a physical aspect of reality from a functional aspect of reality.

Now what happens if we take a beautiful new fully functional fire truck and park it in the middle of a village of tribes people in the rainforest of South America who have no conception whatsoever of what a fire truck is? The fire truck could sit there for years and huts and houses could burn down all around it and the fire truck would never be used to stop a single one of them. Is it still a fire truck? Theoretically it could still function as a fire truck if someone knew how to use it.

What if the tribes people start using the odd object that has been parked in their village as a meeting place for festivals. Is the fire truck now a meeting place? Is a fire truck a fire truck if it doesn’t put out fires? Is a fire truck a meeting place if it is a place where people gather? We are talking about another layer of reality – social reality.

The interesting thing about reality is that it is complex and layered. It contains at least a physical layer, a functional layer and a social layer. Which is really real? If you are a materialist you will say the physical layer is ultimately the real truth and everything else is relative. If you are a functionalist you will lean toward the functional definition of reality. If you are a cultural relativist you will tend to see the social reality as more foundational then the other two.  If you are a nihilistic relativist you will say that none of them are really real because they are all just perspectives and there is nothing that is absolutely real.

The Pragmatists had an interesting take on this. Charles Sanders Peirce saw the world as made up of an infinite array of signs that point toward an ever-evolving deeper reality.  In our example of the fire truck in the busy street there is a series of signs that lead to and interact together. The sound of the siren is a sign of a fire truck. The visual sight of the fire truck is another sign of the fire truck. The sounds that make up the word ‘fire truck’ are yet a third sign of the fire truck. The finger pointing is a sign to look in a particular direction. The fire truck itself is a sign of the ability to put out a fire etc…signs pointing to signs pointing to more signs forever.

What is the ultimate reality toward which all of these signs are pointing? According to Peirce that reality is not only being pointed toward but also revealed through and created by signs. For him signs are not just signs pointing toward reality, but also part of reality. Signs point toward realities. Those realities themselves are also signs that point toward other realities. Reality consists of signs, but signs are also part of reality. Reality is growing in the form of signs that emerge to point toward realities and themselves become the realities that future signs will point toward.

The ultimate reality will not be fully revealed/created until every possible sign – every last pointing – has come into being. Then we will finally see all of the signs that represent every possible perspective on what is real.

Discover a profound recognition of awakened consciousness with this
FREE 6-part program.
Secrets of Profound Meditation
6 Spiritual Insights That Will Transform Your Life

Image

The Mystery School for a New Paradigm

Members Circle
Ongoing Guidance and Support for Artists of Possibility who want to share their deepest wisdom and live a vibrant and profoundly inspired spiritual life.
Join

6

avatar
6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
LiesbethCatherineLiesbeth Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Liesbeth
Guest
Liesbeth

Thank you for this beautiful blog Jeff. I still read your blogs with awe, they just doesn’t immediately create a response because my focus in on physics –not so much on matter, more on emptiness and forces and energy.. I just received the book from Catherine’s colleague, so I will continue studying that line, it is all a miracle and it is fascinating. I hope at one point to connect it to your blogs again..

Catherine
Guest
Catherine

Dear Jeff, it is a wonderful blog ! In a sense you are slowly bringing us to a holon version of reality. Wholes are recognized as such, and this recognition has a cultural aspect and also a genuine inventive aspect, as you describe in your blog when the native “recognize the truck” as being a dancing platform. Parts are the previously recognized wholes. I was curious to learn that pragmatists had already a version of reality which is much in accordance to this whole/part vision. Being myself, I will have to admit that I have never felt very comfortable with… Read more »

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

As always very, very interesting – and the responses too. Thanks.

Catherine
Guest
Catherine

Actually time has probably come to create the Quantum Evolutionary Spirituality.

Don’t know whether it has been done before, but with a title like this, one can only succeed !

Catherine
Guest
Catherine

actually I had a look on the WEB and there is a full range of “stuff” about quantum evolution and spirituality. Ok This looks extremely esoteric and mixing everything from physics to enlightenment states. I would prefer to go slowly, and just stick to the simple statement that if we really want anything new compared to the Old Enlightenment , the territory and the map must merge . The way of merging them shall probably be dictated by quantum entanglement and not by simply blurring the frontiers. With this statement, I am at my edge of the moment, and can… Read more »

Liesbeth
Guest
Liesbeth

Dear Catherine,
I assume I do not have to tell you how much I would like to look into this all. I hardly had any time to look into the book of your colleague with Klein but it looks extremely interesting. And readable for a lay-person. I look forward discussing again.